First Amendment protections

A couple of scattered things converged in my mind last evening: Paypal and the online gambling controversy and the case of David Williams who was fired from the Oregon State University newspaper for questioning the appropriateness of certain black role models.

Online gambling supporters are outraged that the U.S. government is cracking down on the promotion of online gambling:

The sad thing is, none of these media giants have the guts to challenge the Justice Department on this. What about First Amendment protection here?

I don't have a law degree, and I'm willing to be persuaded about the First Amendment implications of online gambling, but I don't see the word "gambling" anywhere in the First Amendment (or, for that matter, the word "pr0nography"):

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I bring up pr0nography because people say, "First they came after Larry Flynt, but I didn't say anything because I didn't publish a sleasy, degrading rag. Then they came after online gambling advertisers, but I didn't say anything because I wasn't trying to get people hooked on an activity that could ruin their lives. Then they came after politically incorrect opinion writers, and there was no one left to protest."

Oregon has, I'm told, one of the most liberal pr0nography situations in the United States. Pr0nography marts scattered across town; no state law preventing "exotic gift" shops from opening next door to churches and schools; a justice system that will protect the sleasy magazine at every turn.

BUT when it comes to a young man suggesting that accused criminals may not be the best representatives of the black community, he gets fired--and from a state university newspaper.

So the ACLU speaks up for the sleasy magazine publisher, but there's still no one to speak for the politically incorrect opinion writer, who is exactly what the First Amendment writers were trying to protect.

Plot points and conflict

My lessons in fiction:

I've finally figured out what a plot point is.

It's a place where the character must either change goals or radically change the means of pursuing those goals.

If it's at the beginning of a story, it's the inciting incident. At that point, the character's everyday life is over, whether it's because Gandalf has brought a troop of dwarves to visit or because a tomboyish FBI agent is assigned to go undercover in a beauty pageant or because the time has come for a carpenter to begin his life as a traveling rabbi.

The character pursues the new goal until something happens to change the goal again. He may succeed at the goal and find out it's not the ultimate good, or he may fail utterly and find out he's been trying all the wrong way. He comes to a point where he must choose between two equally terrifying (for different reasons) courses. That is the crisis.

The climax is the working out of the choice at the crisis. At the end, the world or the character is irreparably changed from the beginning of the story.

Another thing I've had trouble with is motivation. What is the character trying to accomplish?

When the character wakes in the morning, what is the goal that drives his choice of activities through the day? If he's a subsistence hunter-gatherer, it might be providing enough food for the family for the day. If she's a high-powered business woman, it might be making the next deal. If he's neurotic, it might be escaping from emotional pain. If she's an alcoholic, it might be taking or not taking the next drink.

Many people have to navigate among conflicting goals. The businesswoman may be a mother; the hunter-gatherer may be a cave painter; the neurotic may be trying to keep his girlfriend; the alcoholic may be trying to keep her job. Incompatible goals, besides being human, can be a source of conflict.

Pardon me for thinking out loud here. I've got two reasons (not competing goals, though) for doing so. First, verbalizing it will help me learn it. Second, recording it here will make it easier to review later.

Doing my part

I got a call today from the Department of Homeland Security. A nice man, whose name I didn't catch, wanted to ask about some attempted credit card fraud against us last year.

In December someone tried to use our Visa card to buy something in Indonesia. We heard about it from the credit card company. We took it as an ordinary hassle of modern life, joked about how much more interesting or credit cards' lives are than ours, changed the credit card numbers, asked ourselves how the number got to Indonesia, and moved on.

It turns out that ours was one of three numbers used in an attempt to buy "military goods" (the man paused and cast around for the right phrase) in Indonesia. Ours was the second of the three numbers the investigator had called, and he was having trouble putting the data together. We and the other cardholder don't live anywhere near each other; we haven't been out of the country; we haven't been on a cruise. I offered to look through our account records for charges at the time. It turns out that the only thing we have in common with cardholder 1 is that both of us bought an item through E-Bay using Paypal.

Perhaps (just perhaps, mind you, based on incomplete information) someone who works at Paypal could use his inside information to collect credit card numbers--whether by deliberate selection or at random. And suppose he passed on the numbers to someone in the market for "military goods" overseas. If these three widely spaced credit card thefts were handled by local or state authorities, or even if federal, if they were not connected together, it would be difficult to connect the thefts to anyone at Paypal. And there would be a never-ending flood of credit card numbers from around the world to choose from. I wonder if this is a fluke or the tip of an iceberg.

Paypal has already faced some allegations of connection with terrorists; the state of New York basically chased the company out of the online gambling business, reasoning that online gambling can serve as an international money laundering operation. When E-Bay bought Paypal, the gambling stopped.

But that's about an accusation of customers using Paypal for nefarious activities. I can't find anything about Paypal employees being accused of stealing. Of course, it would only take one.

I wasn't going to mention Paypal in this post. I was going to write to Paypal and find out what the organization has to say about its internal security procedures. I went to the Paypal website and couldn't find a way to e-mail the company except by choosing an item from its list. For some reason, "What is your position on giving credit card numbers to potential terrorists?" is not one of the menu items. Calling the phone number revealed that the company's voice routing is as unresponsive as its e-mail.

So I don't have a Paypal response to my concerns. To cancel my account, I would have had to update my credit card, since the one Paypal has is expired. I think I'll leave it that way, open but useless.

The Swan

My friend Anne blogged about the new reality show, The Swan, last week:

I'm outraged by the continual message that only one type of body is beautiful and the rest of us need life-threatening measures in order to get one.

I watched the first episode with my daughter and kept asking what they were doing to these unique and interesting women. It was only the women's sense of unworthiness that made them candidates for this surgery that tried to make cookie-cutter bimbos of them.

And now Cup of Chicha has a detailed post that verbalizes a lot of my horror and some I didn't think of. If you've managed to escape the show, this is a good read, because the show captures and propagates a cultural phenomenon.

Unfortunately, The Swan is loathsome to the degree that it takes itself seriously, and, thanks to the panel's complete lack of intellect, it takes itself very, very seriously. The Swan simply isn't smart enough to realize how disturbing it really is: the panel applauds the idea that the women's husbands will no longer recognize them because it marks their success in creating 'transformation,' not because they know their applause will reveal a shockingly brazen attitude towards the relationship bewteen appearance, familiarity, and emotional attachment. And, while Kelly and Rachel only have a boyfriend and a husband who might fail to recognize them, future contestants will have children. (At 24, I still remember the day when I was five and my father, having just shaved his beard, picked me up from a friend's party. I cried and cried; even if I recognized him, my emotions for him didn't --a face being both love's cue and its subject.)

Source: The Old Hag, who includes this great sentence: "Related: none of these women is ugly AT ALL -- upon waking, we easily eclipse all of them, and we're still cute!"

Can someone help this man?

He's drowning, and I can't swim well enough to save him (metaphorically).

Pejman, an Iranian-Jewish attorney and one of the best voices in the blogosphere, has innocently walked into dangerous country. He asks:

How does the Trinity work, exactly?

and

Jesus died for our sins, according to Church teachings. Does that mean that we are now without original sin?

And the answers he's gotten: Aiyiyiyiyi.

One man writes:

About original sin: I don't need to tell you that o.s. is a kind of metaphor for flawed human nature, with its innate propensity to evil. Having been born just one month after V.I. Lenin went to his reward; having been 12 when my German-speaking mother developed the habit of throwing her apron over her head while listening to Hitler on the short-wave (moaning "Schrecklich, schrecklich!") all the while; having learned at 15 that my eldest brother's best friend, a brilliant idealistic young Jew who volunteered to fight in Spain, had been shot by his comrades for the crime of insufficient Stalinism, I personally have never had any problem with believing in original sin.

Which I think is very good, but then:

Sadly, the doctrine is that the death of Jesus enables forgiveness of personal trespasses for those who sincerely repent. It did not expunge original sin. That is what the sacrament of baptism is all about. The squalling infant at the baptismal font is in danger of never being admitted to the presence of God even if it should have the misfortune of dying innocent of personal transgression. Hence the "need" for baptism to expunge the stain of original sin.
It is purely ritual, independent of any personal volition. Once admitted to christianity by baptism, one cannot cease to be christian, one can only become an apostate. The catechism will more than suffice to explain this draconian doctrine.

Sorry to go on at such great length. Briefly, the Father is the God of the Torah--pure disembodied Intellect, Will, and Power. He thinks; He thinks in words; the Word of God made human flesh is Jesus, the Son. The Holy Spirit is the eternal relationship of love between Father and Son. There you have it: a huge, indigestible lump of mystery that has to be taken on faith. If one can swallow that, all the rest--Incarnation, Immaculate Conception (which means the man Jesus was born free of original sin), virgin birth, miracles, crucifixion and resurrection, moral precepts--all is relatively easy.

And this:

Father = Brahma - Creator
The Son = Vishnu - Sustainer
Holy Ghost = Shiva - Destroyer

A Hindu take on the Christian holy trinity.

Or:

The "Holy Trinity" is peppers, onions, & celery, as any New Orleanian could tell y... what? We're not talking Red Beans & Rice recipies? D'oh! At least with Red Beans, there's never been a war over the ingredients. (As opposed to how the whole "Pops, Junior, & The Spook" thing works...)

Here's one that's not bad:

Re: the Trinity, think of God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit with this analogy:

God is the sun in the sky. Jesus is the light emananting from the sun. The Holy Spirit is the heat emananting from the sun. All of them are one with separate properties, and each is dependent upon and useless without the other. What good would the sun be if it gave no light or heat? And heat and light could not exist without a source.

I love this one:

Pejman, What a marvelous question, and one that I cannot deign to answer. However, the spark you started grew into a raging fire as noted in all of the above answers from other worthies. I know that the Trinity is accepted by faith, whether understood or not. My grandfather was a Methodist Minister and I remember a wonderful sermon he gave on the subject. I remember being mesmerized by his eloquence, but I do not remember the text. Regardless, the upshot of his sermon was that the concept of the Trinity was a matter of faith, not proof.

My grandfather explained it all in a sermon, which I forgot. It's probably a little like those dreams when you finally understand your own Purpose in Life and then wake up.

Sinfulness is our nature, our natural state without Grace. Salvation, Christ's death on the cross, is the redemptive intercession of a loving God that enables Grace into our lives.

No, no, no. Humanness is our nature. Sinfulness is added on.

[quoting from another post]"Seems to me a subtlety about this also separates the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, but I forget the details."

IIRC (and to vastly simplify), in large part it came down to a dispute over whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, or just the Father.

The religious wars that have resulted from this has caused me to have some sympathy towards the notion that the Devil invented the notion of the Trinity in order to give men yet another reason to kill one another.

Thank you for that vast simplification.

And then there's this:

I recently read the version of the New Testament most popular in the USA (King James) and came away with the idea, sort of, that the Father is the God of the Jews, the Son came about when God through Mary created Jesus as a human and the Holy Ghost was God within when the individual accepts Jesus' life as the son of God, his death by crucifixion and resurrection. And further that the holy trinity is the one God. As for original sin, I see it simply as disobedience of God. Hope my 2 cents doesn't cloud the issue further, but you either believe or not, it's our freedom to choose that makes us culpable for our actions. I also believe anyone who wants to harm others over the differences of opinion on this subject has totally missed the point of the Christ. Good luck.

"Begotten, not made," the creed says. Thanks for the wish of luck. We're all going to need it.

It also is the reason the Arabs didn't sign on - that whole "3=1" thing is a little much for anyone familiar with math. You have better luck with ignorant goat-herders and fishermen.

Uh, the Middle East was Christian until the Muslim conquests beginning in the seventh century. Muhammed himself may have missed the Trinitarian nuance, having come into contact with Nestorian Christians. But St. Athanasius, who did a lot of the fourth-century groundwork in the Trinity, was from Alexandria (Egypt).

I like this one a lot:

Sheldon Vanauken, a student of C.S. Lewis, compared God to an author, and Christ as the character in the story who is the author. He's creator and unlimited, and he injects himself into the story (the World) as one character, who leads and is the sacrificial lamb. And as one of the characters he's the same as us, limited and subject to temptation.

And here's one that has me wondering if I missed something:

One can go on and on : one of the major causes of the Great Schism of 1054 between the western and Orthodox churches was over whether Christ was both man and God, or man and God separately.

After a nice quote from Francis Schaefer, this one finds sibling rivalry among the three Persons of the Trinity:

If God is self-sufficient, He must also be capable of sacrifice without dependence on creation. Sacrifice involves three components: the sender and recipient of the sacrifice, and the thing to be sacrificed. Prior to creation, what would the persons of the Trinity have to sacrifice? Attention. Remember the old saying, "Two's company, three's a crowd?" All things being equal, when two people are together each receives 100% of the other's attention. Throw in a third person, and each person present must divide his/her attention between two people. Jesus could sacrifice his life on Earth because He has always sacrificed.

Perhaps predictably, the Presbyterian response goes on for two screens. (I skipped it.)

This one gets right to the heart of the translogical logic:

There most certainly is a Christian doctrine of the Trinity that is not a matter of sectarian opinion, and it is really quite simple. This formulation is very ancient and considers the Trinity as a doctrine made up of six propositions along with the assumption that there is only one God. Each of these propositions are quite easily found in the Bible. They are as follows:

1. The Father is God
2. The Son is God
3. The Holy Spirit is God.
4. The Father is not the Son.
5. The Son is not the Holy Spirit.
6. The Holy Spirit is not the Father.

Not a bad baseline, to my mind.

OK. I'm going to weigh in. I won't drown, just get all wet.

I'm back. My answer went on for two screens also, and if there's any justice after my snarky comment above, no one will read it either.

Kenai

Kenai sleeps in the back yard with her head on her front paws and her back legs lying useless under her. She is more than 16 years old, and her face, which once had the expression of a mischievous racoon, is now gray. Every few hours she barks her distress. She's not in constant pain, but she can't move without someone lifting and carrying her back end. I think it may be time for the long last ride.

She came to us as a puppy, the whelp of a malamute mother and a golden retriever father, the most adventurous of a litter of eight puppies, seven of whom, I believe, ended up in the pound as too much dog for suburban owners to handle.

And Kenai was a lot to handle. When she reached her full size of 105 pounds, she was as strong as a horse, and she considered herself the Alpha Female of every walk she took. She never met a human she didn't like, and after she passed puppyhood, she never met a dog that didn't annoy her into a fury. The feeling was mutual. When we took her for neighborhood walks, toy poodles would come racing out of their garages, cross the street and attack her. I told an owner once that its dog ought to pick on someone its own size.

When I took her walking on leash, in those days before head collars, she would pull me up hills by just tugging against her choke collar. The choke collar never really got her attention, no matter how hard I jerked in the way that was instructed back then, because it was cushioned against that thick mat of her fur.

When Kenai was a young dog, we also had a Weimaraner named Coho (a Chinook word for "silver"; she came to us with that name). One day, my husband was out working in the yard, and when he came inside, he found that he had left the television on. The dogs were sitting side by side in front of it, their ears perked, and their heads tilted in curiosity.

That's funny, he thought. They don't usually watch TV. So he watched a little bit to see what the interest was. It was a fishing show, and the topic was fishing for coho salmon in the Kenai River.

When Kenai was young, we owned a half-acre of land in a wooded suburban neighborhood, where we saw opossums, raccoons and once even a bobcat. One spring was a boom year for opossoms, and Kenai killed several over a couple of weeks. It's not a big deal; there are a lot of them, and opossoms are not a native species here. I would find the remains and bury them, and go on about my activities. The problem was that in celebration, or maybe going after somekind of olfactory camouflage, Kenai would frequently roll in possum squat.

One night I came home late from choir practice or something, and Kenai came running up to greet me. I reached down to scratch her neck, and ewww. I was too tired to give her a bath that night, so I left her outside. Five minutes after I went to bed, I heard her in the back yard giving the insistent bark! bark! bark! bark! that was her hunting cry. We were in a wooded suburb, but not so far out in the country that it didn't matter if a dog barked and barked and barked late at night. I rose grumbling and then heard the chainlink fence rattle and a scuffle that told me I was too late to rescue that one.

I dressed hastily and took a flashlight outside with me, aiming to find the dead possum and bury it. I called Kenai and heard a movement. I trained the flashlight on her, and she ran through the yard, spotlighted like a movie star, shaking the possum like a rag toy and calling me with her eyes to come out and play.

And now she lies in the back yard, literally on her last legs, in the same place where she used to lie and smile at the wind ruffling her fur.

Suffering child

There's a lot going on in the world -- stuff I would blog about, stuff I would leave to others, stuff that's important or funny or both -- but when your kid is suffering, it doesn't seem to matter.

If you're praying people, and I believe a lot of you are, please remember Vera, 19, who is going through difficulties, and her family, who share them with her.

Thanks.

Fitzgerald's film-writing career

Not. A collection of F. Scott Fitzgerald's screenplays goes to the University of South Carolina after being dug out of a file cabinet in Warner Brothers Studios somewhere. (I have an image of the scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark when Indiana Jones sees where the Lost Ark might be warehoused.)

Apparently, Fitzgerald wasn't much of a screenwriter, since only one of his screenplays made it into production, after much rewriting, but he worked hard at it and produced many drafts and background materials.

A couple of things jumped out at me from this story. First:

"He took screenwriting very seriously," [said Matthew Bruccoli of the University of South Carolina], "and it's heartbreaking to see how much effort he put into it." The new archive reveals, among other things, that Fitzgerald approached every screenplay as if it were a novel and often wrote long back stories for each of the characters before setting down a word of dialogue.

That's what Robert McKee recommends as the general process for screenwriting.

It didn't work out, all the same. "Billy Wilder, Fitzgerald's friend and admirer in his Hollywood days, always thought the notion of turning him into a screenwriter was a little misguided. He once compared Fitzgerald to 'a great sculptor who is hired to do a plumbing job.'"

McKee's categorization that screenplays deal in image; stage plays deal in dialogue; and novels deal in the inner life is probably as good an explanation as any of why Raymond Chandler would be a more successful screenwriter than Fitzgerald and why, for that matter, Henry James's plays never did well either.

The Onion Dome is up

I neglected to mention that The Onion Dome is up.

Our intrepid editor has a story about the, shall we say, dark underside of Pascha. I reported on an Orthodox answer to Left Behind, and Marie told of the triumph over sexism in her parish.

Father Vasiliy gives us the true and correct response to "Christ is Risen," and the comments in the Feedback Blog have some American (and Russian-American) variations.

Saudi cell phones

Saudi blogger Alhamedi tells how important cell phones are in Saudi Arabia.

He tells a classic story:

2. A Saudi was giving a presentation at my place of employment. Screen, PC projector, Powerpoint, the whole thing. Then his phone rang. He didn't switch it off, he answered it. Just as well, it was his Mother! We sat listening for 5 minutes while he explained why he'd not been to see her for two days. I have to say, some of his excuses were ingenious, I'll use them myself sometime. Finally he resumed his presentation, without an apology.

He adds:

So that's an idea of the priority that we attach to our phones. And when the day dawns that all phones are camera phones, and the Muttawa try to confiscate them, tha'll be the day that the revolution starts. You heard it on this blog first.

Check out The Religious Policeman for a humorous and insightful view of Saudi culture.

Source: Roger L. Simon

Silmarillion in 1,000 words

I've confessed recently to a short attention span. It was longer, once upon a time, and I'm glad I took the opportunity when I had it to read the Silmarillion. If my attention span ever gets longer again, I might read it again.

In the meantime, J. the Honourary Canadian gives us the Silmarillion in 1,000 words. Here's the opening:

AINULINDALE:
ILUVATAR: Ahem.
AINUR: Wow! Existence!
ILUVATAR: *blows pitch pipe* LA!
AINUR: LA LA LA!
ILUVATAR: LA LA!
AINUR: LA LA!
MELKOR: This sucks. BUM BUM BA DUM!
AINUR: Um. . . la?
ILUVATAR: Ahem. LA!
MELKOR: Boop bop-a-doo-bop!
ILUVATAR: LA, dammit.
MELKOR: Bwam bardle ningle boom.
AINUR: . . .
ILUVATAR: Right, you're out of the band.
MELKOR: Fine, I was leaving anyway.
AINUR: . . .
ILUVATAR: What are you waiting for?
AINUR: Oh. Right. Newly created world. Sorry. Great jam session, big guy!
ILUVATAR: Yeesh.

It's all there, right to the very end:

RING: *melts*
SAURON: AUGH!
MORDOR: BOOM.
GONDORIANS: *change calendar*
ELROND, GALADRIEL: Road trip!
GANDALF: Hi Cirdan! Still got your ring!
CIRDAN: Cool. Let's go to Valinor!

Source: Boing Boing

April Fools Day

(I know it's way past April Fools, but at least you know I'm not joking.)

This guy says Muslims take April Fool's Day way too seriously:

The things that happen on April Fools' Day are many. Some people have been told that their child or spouse or someone who is dear to them has died, and unable to bear this shock, they have died. Some have been told that they are being laid off, or that there has been a fire or an accident in which their familyhas been killed, so they suffer paralysis or heart attacks, or similar afflictions. 

Some people have been told about their wives, that they have been seen with other men, and this has led them to kill or divorce their wives.

I guess if a culture plays this kind of pranks for April Fools, instead of producing documentaries on the Swiss spaghetti harvest, it might be a good idea for someone to say, "We don't do April Fools well. Let's not celebrate it."

But no. The reason Muhammad Al-Munajjid says not to celebrate it is because April Fools Day doesn't fit any of the three acceptable reasons for lying: 1) to please one's wife; 2) war; 3) to reconcile between people.

Besides, as no one else in the world seems to know, April Fools Day celebrates the conquest of Andalusia from the Muslims in 1492. "Fools" because over the years preceding the conquest, foreigners made fools of the Muslim army by sending in wine and cigars to Spain for free. Grenada, the last stronghold, of the Muslims fell on April 1, 1492. (Since Christopher Columbus, who left Europe in 1492, was the first to bring back tobacco seeds from the New World, we have to wonder whether something else in those cigars or if this is more fun with history.)

But wait. If the stronghold fell on April 1, the free wine and cigars must have been coming in for years, right? So what's the point of celebrating for one day a tactic of years? Never mind. There's more.

From that year until the present, they celebrate this day and consider the Muslims to be fools. They do not regard only the army at Granada to be fools who are easily deceived; rather they apply that to the entire Muslim Ummah.

Funny. I don't think the makers of Swiss spaghetti farm documentary gave any thought to Grenada, Andalusia or the Muslim Ummah. Now suddenly when kids send a newcomer out snipe hunting, they're commemorating a battle they never heard of and could hardly care less about.

Although Snopes recognizes that "how the custom of pranking on April 1 came about remains shrouded in mystery," it gives a number of possibilities, none of which has anything to do with the conquest of Grenada.

To be fair, Annie's Exceedingly Smiley April Fool's Day Page also starts with a couple of screens of everything the Bible says about "fools." (The Bible also doesn't say anything about Swiss spaghetti farmers.) Annie does offer some positive suggestions, including the slightly sneaky secret pal trick, and she omits the loopy history.

I became interested in this topic because of a Google search that brought someone to this page by accident. The more I looked at it, the curiouser it became, until it's well past midnight as I'm finishing up this post. So maybe the joke's on me.

UPDATE: Islam: The Modern Religion calls the idea a hoax and says this about it:

So regarding the email claiming that April Fools Day is a celebration of the take over of Muslim Spain, it is clear the whole thing is a made up lie. This is totally unacceptable and should be brought to the attention of the one who sent you this lie in the first place. A good Muslim would never accept to repeat lies and fabrications especially in presenting facts about the history of Islam.

If you have received such a letter it is your duty in front of Allah to write back to those who also received it and ask them to contact all of those on their lists and email the truth about this issue. And we should all fear a Day when we will stand in front of Allah and be asked about these matters.

If we don't do something about correcting the education of our beloved brothers and sisters in Islam, then everyday on the internet is MUSLIM FOOLS DAY.

By the way, there's another another humdinger of a hoax listed there, but since the point of the site is to debunk it and not to promote it, I won't tell what it is.

You've got to see this

It's a Stalin vs. Hitler comic. The drawings are truly creepy, and the story will send shivers up your spine.

Helpfully translated and annoted in English.

Source: memepool

A hopeful sign

Razi Azmi, writing in the Daily Times of Pakistan, shows why I still have hope that Islam can live at peace with its neighbors in religion.

No, the negative image of Muslims is not the result of malicious Western propaganda against Islam. On the country, all the documentaries concerning Islam and Muslim lands shown on the mainstream western television channels -- and there have been many in the last two years -- present a very sympathetic picture of Islam as a religion and of Muslims as people. The image Muslims find unflattering reflects the larger reality of the Muslim world, steeped in dictatorship, corruption, ignorance and illiteracy, and characterised by the repression of women, honour killings, child abuse, sectarian and religious violence, persecution of minorities and a general and pervasive denial of basic freedoms and human rights.

I have hope, not because the Islamic world is in the muddle he describes, but because if Muslims face the muddle, they can find their way out of it. As long as Muslims continue in denial, shifting the blame and wailing about discrimination when people simply point out photos Muslim themselves have shot, there will be no motion toward peace.

The whole piece is worth reading.

Source: Dhimmi Watch

Newspaper columnist suppressed in Corvallis

I'm not holding my breath for the ACLU to fight the case of David Williams, columnist at the Daily Barometer at Oregon State University.

Williams's column is daringly titled "A message from a white male to the African American community." In it, he points out that some black celebrities held up as role models for the community aren't good ones. He says, "One would think that with the strong presence of talented blacks in government, sports and entertainment, this minority base would have a slew of noble and moral leaders."

OK, I don't see any white sheets yet.

Singer Robert Kelly stands accused of child pr0nography [my deliberate misspelling] by Chicago authorities. The primary evidence in the case is a videotape that allegedly shows him having sex with an underage girl.

While Kelly rightfully has the presumption of innocence, I don't think he is the type of person that deserves praise.

During the recent Soul Train Music Awards, Kelly received trophies and applause. While being in serious trouble for a sick crime, his music continues to earn him millions of dollars in sales. In fact, in January he was nominated for an NAACP Image Award.

In my eyes, that's the equivalent of nominating Bob Dole to host the Oscars -- it just wouldn't make much sense.

Here's the racism. Williams dares to criticize the NAACP. And he even suggests that promoting these morally challenged celebrities is harmful to the black community:

Sure, Kelly, Simpson and Iverson are just mere instances of misbehavior in the grand scheme of things. Their misconduct is not what necessarily hurts minorities; it's the acceptance and lack of accountability African American leaders have chosen to embrace these figures with.

If this is what constitutes racism in the 21st century, maybe it's time for the NAACP to disband and put its dues and fund-raising into AIDS research or something. Or at least explain why an accused pr0n producer is a role model to be preferred over all the black business people, authors, journalists, performers, athletes, religious leaders and so forth who don't have an accusation of murder, pr0nography, or other corruption pending against them. It's the NAACP that breeds racism, because people who don't know any better come to think that the Robert Kellys are the best the black community has to offer.

By the way, I've made a copy of the piece in case the Barometer takes it down. If you can't find it at the link, e-mail me.

Source: Tongue Tied - Free Speech - Oregon Style

A virtual gathering of the female Orthobloggers

Karl expresses happiness that so many Othodox women are joining the blogosphere. He helpfully lists a few of them (us).

I know that we women are taking a little longer to warm up to the blog forum than the guys. I think it's a technology thing. Heaven knows, if you give us a platform, we'll talk. One think I noticed though is how all our blogs fit together into a perfect conversation. Let's see, after a night of Sacred Insomnia, we meet The Alto Section and take A Catechumen's Walk to Laura's Front Porch, where under The Blue Canopy we have Morning Coffee while Lola Knits and Spins and Havdala tends her Doves and Pomegranates, and we are all So Joyful watching The Light Fraction and talking of Lamb Thoughts and A World of Speculation.

It reminds me of our parish's women's retreat at Cannon Beach coming up later this month.

It's Christian bells vs. Muslim prayer calls

Michael, of Divine Salamis asks in response to Muslim worship in the Cordoba cathedral: "So, is this the re-reconquest of Andalusia we're seeing?"

Obviously, Spain/Andalusia has its own path, and whether it's in the direction of reconquest will be obvious only in hindsight. But in light of the "original conquerors" of North America, even a simple noise ordinance story makes me nervous.

It seems that the Muslims in the Detroit area want a noise variance so that they can amplify their five-times-a-day call to prayer from the mosques in the city. That's five times a day, seven days a week, 365/6 days per year. The reason they offer: it's only fair; we have to listen to church bells, sometimes as early as 6 a.m.

It seems like just a local zoning thing, but Muslims have issues with bells. This windy Muslim apologist acknowledges that at the time of the Islamic conquest of Jerusalem, "by . . . edict [Christians'] church bells were taken from them because their din annoyed the Muslims."

Ronald Hilton at Stanford University, writing about Globalization: Music, says:

The ban on church bells is ancient and not unique to Spain. I don't have sources at hand to check and cite, but Christians were very early on in the history of Islam prevented from using bells and forced instead to use wooden clappers. The Muslim call to prayer, vocal rather than instrumental, was to have primacy.

Here's another Islam-promotion site, Saudi Aramco World:

There were, to be sure, ground rules which non-Muslims were expected to follow: no church towers, as the mosques had to be the tallest religious buildings in town; no church bells, as they might distract from the muezzin; no mixed congregations.

If that seems to be ancient history, consider this:

UN forbids use of church bells in Kosovo (because they irritate the muslims)

Priest Velimir Stojanovic, who lives with his family in the churchyard of the Serbian Orthodox Church of St. Sava in the southern part of Kosovska Mitrovica, told Tanjug that the Greek soldiers protecting this shrine have forbidden the use of the church bells.

"Representatives of KFOR introduced this ban with the explanation that Orthodox church bells irritate the Albanians," says Father Velimir. "The last time the bells were heard was on Easter Sunday, April 15 of this year," he explained, adding that so far he has not publicized this ban because he thought it was temporary. "The church bells did not ring on Ascension Day (Spasovdan, May 25) and I think that this is not good for either the church or the people," said Father Velimir.

Every day, five times a day, the song of the muezzins from the minarets of three mosques in the southern, Albanian part of the town can be heard. A fourth mosque is open and undisturbed in the village of Zabari, near Kosovska Mitrovica.

I don't like paranoia, and I accept on faith that the majority of the world's Muslims are willing to live in peace and harmony with their neighbors, but I make the uncomfortable observation that accommodation goes only one direction, and it seems to be irreversible. Is the Detroit noise case just something for neighbors to work out or a skirmish in a long battle?

Cathedral may be site of Muslim worship

Spanish Muslims are asking the Vatican to allow them to hold worship services in the cathedral at Cordoba. The cathedral apparently was built on the site of an ancient mosque.

The Guardian clarifies:

The Muslim community is going out of its way to portray the proposals as a union, and not a clash of faiths. "In no way is this request about reclaiming our rights--far less any kind of reconquest," Isabel Romero, a member of the Islamic Council of Spain, told a local newspaper.

"Instead, we want to give our support to the universal character of this building."

The response is unclear. In one place in the story, the Islamic Council says the proposal was very well received in the Vatican. In another place the director of a mosque in nearby Grenada says that the church council doesn't seem very cooperative. Both could be true, of course, and either could be a misunderstanding, but it seems that any Catholic assent to the "universal character of the building" would be an abdication of the "cathedral" character of the building.

The folks at Dhimmi Watch ask when Christians will be able to worship in Hagia Sophia Cathedral in Constantinople. It's a valid question.

UPDATE: Dhimmi Watch points out that the ancient mosque was built on the site of an earlier church.

The Fool

I've posted a short story titled "The Fool" at The Fellowship of St. Caedmon. I'd be interested in feedback, whether in the comments over there or here.

"It's a sensitive case," Mark Radcliffe said.

Eugene Peters watched the senior deputy district attorney get up from his long mahogany desk and go to the window.

"We don't want anyone saying Multnomah County doesn't care if an occasional church burns down." He gazed thoughtfully over the park below, as if looking down from Mount Olympus at the curious activities of the mortals.

It was a habit that annoyed the hell out of Eugene, and the fact that it annoyed him so badly annoyed him even more. Who cared, after all, if Mark had the best view in the building, if he used it to punctuate his conversations, if he opened the vertical blinds just enough that supplicants in his office got barely a glimpse of pearl-gray sky?

Read more

UN shootout in Kosovo

A Jordanian UN police officer fires on other UN police officers in one of the hotspots in Kosovo, and wounded 10 Americans and one Australian and killed two Americans.

Concurrently, a Bosnian Muslim has surrendered to Spanish authorities for questioning in regard to the March 11 bombing of the commuter train. He says he just happened to share an apartment with one of the bombers. His father said he went to Spain as a student in 1993 but didn't know what the boy was studying.

Most of Bosnia's Muslims are secular and practice a moderate Islam, although extremist Islamic fighters--many from Arab countries--fought on the Muslim side in the country's 1992-95 war, which killed an estimated 260,000 people.

Now comes a well-meaning Amarillo, Texas, columnist in a 10-gallon hat making the same mistake that fellow-Texan Pres. George W. Bush made at his press conference last week--dropping Kosovo into a list of U.S. success stories. Buckaroo Baxter Black says this:

We are not the bad guys. Our record is a proud one. Remember that fact every time you hear of citizens protesting in Kosovo, Kabul, Krakow, Sarajevo, the Philippines, the Netherlands, in England, East Berlin, Baghdad and every other place on earth where we have won.

There aren't any citizens protesting in Kosovo. There are armed thugs and cowering minorities protected by UN police who shoot each other and NATO troops armed with rubber bullets and tear gas.

Bush didn't put us there, but I wish he'd move that expedition over to the "minus" column.